Jennings v. State

350 S.W.3d 858, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337, 2011 WL 4944471
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 2011·No. ED 95045·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Adrian Jennings (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment, after an eviden-tiary hearing, denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035.

*859 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jennings v. State, 350 S.W.3d 858, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337, 2011 WL 4944471 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

350 S.W.3d 858 (Jennings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Villa West, LLC v. Klingert
350 S.W.3d 858 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)