Jennings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jennings v. State

162 S.W.3d 525, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 765, 2005 WL 1163708

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jennings v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 600 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 17, 2005·No. No. WD 63995·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following his conviction by guilty plea to tampering with a witness, Section 575.270, receipt of stolen property, Section 570.080, endangering the welfare of a child, Section 568.045, and domestic assault in the third degree, Section 565.074, John Jennings filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Jennings alleged that his guilty plea was not made knowingly or voluntarily in light of the circumstances. The court denied the motion. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following his conviction by guilty plea to tampering with a witness, Section 575.270, receipt of stolen property, Section 570.080, endangering the welfare of a child, Section 568.045, and domestic assault in the third degree, Section 565.074, John Jennings filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Jennings alleged that his guilty plea was not made knowingly or voluntarily in light of the circumstances. The court denied the motion. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Jennings v. State, 162 S.W.3d 525, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 765, 2005 WL 1163708 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

162 S.W.3d 525 (Jennings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.