Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Jennings v. State

Jennings v. State

96 S.E. 397, 22 Ga. App. 550, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 596
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 30, 1918·No. 9647·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, a special ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete within itself. When, for a proper understanding of it, it is necessary to refer to another special ground of the motion, or to the record, it will not be considered. This ruling disposes of the special grounds of .the motion for a new trial.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur. Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Fulton superior court—Judge Hill. March 2, 1918. Tillou Von Nunes, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, B. A. Stephens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jennings v. State, 96 S.E. 397, 22 Ga. App. 550, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 596 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

96 S.E. 397 (Jennings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Emory University v. Lee
104 S.E.2d 234 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Touchton v. Mock
86 S.E.2d 699 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Edenfield v. State
141 S.E. 220 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Gillespie v. State
140 S.E. 791 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)