Jennings v. State

933 S.W.2d 393, 326 Ark. 824, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 665
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 9, 1996
DocketCR 96-1396
StatusPublished

This text of 933 S.W.2d 393 (Jennings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennings v. State, 933 S.W.2d 393, 326 Ark. 824, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 665 (Ark. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Don Jennings, by his attorney, Christopher Carter, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part by relying on the court reporter’s calculation of the due date.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is therefore granted.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
933 S.W.2d 393, 326 Ark. 824, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-state-ark-1996.