Jennings v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Jennings v. State

108 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 678

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 27, 1926

Docket6 Div. 953.

StatusPublished

This text of 108 So. 924 (Jennings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jennings v. State, 108 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 678 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

At the April, 1923, term of the Jefferson circuit court, this appellant was-indicted for the offense of murder in the first degree; the specific charge being that .he unlawfully and with malice aforethought killed Cy Hardy by shooting him with a gun, etc. On the 10th day of October, 1925, he was duly and legally arraigned upon the indictment, and for answer thereto interposed a plea of not guilty. The trial of appellant was had on October 22, 1925, and resulted in a verdict by the jury finding the defendant guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and fixing his punishment at five years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. Judgment was pronounced and entered accordingly, from which the appeal was taken. There is no bill of exceptions. The appeal is upon the record proper, and this record appears regular in all things. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

At the April, 1923, term of the Jefferson circuit court, this appellant was-indicted for the offense of murder in the first degree; the specific charge being that .he unlawfully and with malice aforethought killed Cy Hardy by shooting him with a gun, etc. On the 10th day of October, 1925, he was duly and legally arraigned upon the indictment, and for answer thereto interposed a plea of not guilty. The trial of appellant was had on October 22, 1925, and resulted in a verdict by the jury finding the defendant guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and fixing his punishment at five years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. Judgment was pronounced and entered accordingly, from which the appeal was taken. There is no bill of exceptions. The appeal is upon the record proper, and this record appears regular in all things. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-state-alactapp-1926.