Jennings v. Morris

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Jennings v. Morris

61 A. 115, 211 Pa. 600, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 514

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 1, 1905

DocketAppeal, No. 261

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 61 A. 115 (Jennings v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jennings v. Morris, 61 A. 115, 211 Pa. 600, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 514 (Pa. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The learned referee in the court below reviewed the evi[606]*606dence with great care, and found as a fact, evidently with reluctance arising from the dishonesty of the defense, that the transactions out of which the plaintiff’s claim arose were wagering agreements not enforceable at law. To the facts thus found he applied the law with entire accuracy, and after a most careful examination we are forced to sustain his conclusions.

Judgment affirmed on the report of the referee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The learned referee in the court below reviewed the evi[606]*606dence with great care, and found as a fact, evidently with reluctance arising from the dishonesty of the defense, that the transactions out of which the plaintiff’s claim arose were wagering agreements not enforceable at law. To the facts thus found he applied the law with entire accuracy, and after a most careful examination we are forced to sustain his conclusions.

Judgment affirmed on the report of the referee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A. 115, 211 Pa. 600, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-morris-pa-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack