Jennings v. Longino
This text of 186 S.E. 672 (Jennings v. Longino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In a suit against a guardian and the surety on his bond, for an accounting in relation to a fund that the guardian had received and deposited with the surety for his protection in going upon the bond, and for receiver to collect the fund and make distribution under orders of the court, an allegation that the petitioner was administrator upon the estate of the ward was subject to special demurrer on the ground that it did not state the date of the death of such person, or by what court the .petitioner was appointed administrator; and an amendment alleging only that the petitioner was '“the bodily heir” of the ward was insufficient to meet the grounds of special demurrer; and in [633]*633the absence of further amendment the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action.
2. It is unnecessary to deal with the exceptions to the judgment relating to other grounds of demurrer. But it is directed that the rulings of the trial court, other than as dealt with above, be vacated without prejudice to either party.
Judgment affirmed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 S.E. 672, 182 Ga. 632, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-longino-ga-1936.