Jennings v. Kellogg USA, Inc.

Eighth Circuit

Jennings v. Kellogg USA, Inc.

13 F. App'x 442

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 12, 2001

DocketNo. 00-2779

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 F. App'x 442 (Jennings v. Kellogg USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jennings v. Kellogg USA, Inc., 13 F. App'x 442 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vishnue L. Jennings appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in Jennings’s employment discrimination action. After de novo review of the record and a thorough review of the parties’ submissions, see LaCroix v. Sears, Roebuck, & Co., 240 F.3d 688, 690 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review), we conclude summary judgment for defendants was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Vishnue L. Jennings appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in Jennings’s employment discrimination action. After de novo review of the record and a thorough review of the parties’ submissions, see LaCroix v. Sears, Roebuck, & Co., 240 F.3d 688, 690 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review), we conclude summary judgment for defendants was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 F. App'x 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-kellogg-usa-inc-ca8-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack