Jennings v. Kalamazoo

6 N.W. 203, 44 Mich. 99
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 17, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 N.W. 203 (Jennings v. Kalamazoo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennings v. Kalamazoo, 6 N.W. 203, 44 Mich. 99 (Mich. 1880).

Opinion

Marston, C. J.

This is an application for respondent to show cause why a certain motion made in a cause pending in the circuit court should not be granted. In a cause heard.on appeal from justice’s court, judgment was rendered December 1st, 1879, against one of the defendants for damages and costs. On the 31st day of January, 1880, an execution was issued, but dated back so that it appeared on its face to have been issued December 22d, 1879. A motion was afterwards made, based upon a showing of the above facts, for an order that the execution be returned by the sheriff, and that the same be set aside or amended by having it bear date as when issued. This motion was denied.

We think no mandamus should issue. In any question hereafter arising in an action brought against the sureties, the facts above set forth could then be shown. They are not, therefore, without ample remedy.

The motion must be denied.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Dorr
85 P. 533 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1906)
Stevens v. Ellsworth
63 N.W. 683 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.W. 203, 44 Mich. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-kalamazoo-mich-1880.