Jennings v. Jennings

New York Supreme Court

Jennings v. Jennings

186 Misc. 1021, 63 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2370

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 12, 1946

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 186 Misc. 1021 (Jennings v. Jennings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jennings v. Jennings, 186 Misc. 1021, 63 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2370 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Bergan, J.

The concealment of a lack of love and affection declared by one of the parties to a marriage has several times been held insufficient to ground an annulment for fraud. (Feig v. Feig, 232 App. Div. 172; Schaeffer v. Schaeffer, 160 App. Div. 48; Griffin v. Griffin, 122 Misc. 837; Longtin v. Longtin, 22 N. Y. S. 2d 827.) The legal theory underlying some of the decisions on this point seems to be that such a fraud does not go to the essentials of the marriage.

But if the concept of what is “ essential ” to a marriage has been greatly broadened by Shonfeld v. Shonfeld (260 N. Y. 477), still the defrauded party is under some obligation to discover such a fraud with reasonable dispatch and to disavow the marriage. The manifestations of a concealed lack of love and affection ought not to take very long after the marriage has been entered into. Similarly, a concealed purpose not to establish a home cannot remain concealed indefinitely. The defrauded party must, at least, have some reasonably intelligent insight into the true state of affairs.

Here the marriage occurred in 1929, over sixteen years before plaintiff says she discovered the fraud that her husband had not loved her in 1929 and had not then intended ever to establish a home. In the meantime there had been a child bom, a separation and a reconciliation.

I think the plaintiff has acquiesced in whatever misrepresentations there were and that the action is barred under the provisions of section 1139 of the Civil Practice Act.

Application for judgment denied. Submit decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bergan, J.

The concealment of a lack of love and affection declared by one of the parties to a marriage has several times been held insufficient to ground an annulment for fraud. (Feig v. Feig, 232 App. Div. 172; Schaeffer v. Schaeffer, 160 App. Div. 48; Griffin v. Griffin, 122 Misc. 837; Longtin v. Longtin, 22 N. Y. S. 2d 827.) The legal theory underlying some of the decisions on this point seems to be that such a fraud does not go to the essentials of the marriage.

But if the concept of what is “ essential ” to a marriage has been greatly broadened by Shonfeld v. Shonfeld (260 N. Y. 477), still the defrauded party is under some obligation to discover such a fraud with reasonable dispatch and to disavow the marriage. The manifestations of a concealed lack of love and affection ought not to take very long after the marriage has been entered into. Similarly, a concealed purpose not to establish a home cannot remain concealed indefinitely. The defrauded party must, at least, have some reasonably intelligent insight into the true state of affairs.

Here the marriage occurred in 1929, over sixteen years before plaintiff says she discovered the fraud that her husband had not loved her in 1929 and had not then intended ever to establish a home. In the meantime there had been a child bom, a separation and a reconciliation.

I think the plaintiff has acquiesced in whatever misrepresentations there were and that the action is barred under the provisions of section 1139 of the Civil Practice Act.

Application for judgment denied. Submit decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 Misc. 1021, 63 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-jennings-nysupct-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack