Jennings v. Jackson

102 Ohio St. 3d 164
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 12, 2004
DocketNo. 2003-2153
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 102 Ohio St. 3d 164 (Jennings v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennings v. Jackson, 102 Ohio St. 3d 164 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} On November 8, 2000, the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas convicted appellant, Ellis L. Jennings, of four counts of gross sexual imposition and sentenced him to seven years in prison. On appeal, the court of appeals affirmed. State v. Jennings (Sept. 13, 2001), Franklin App. No. 00AP-1283, 2001 WL 1045490.

{¶ 2} On September 12, 2003, Jennings filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Warren County for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his release from prison. [165]*165Jennings claimed that his trial court lacked jurisdiction to convict and sentence him because the R.C. 2901.13 statute of limitations had expired before the state’s prosecution had commenced. Appellee, Warren Correctional Institution Warden Wanza Jackson, moved to dismiss the petition. On November 6, 2003, the court of appeals granted Jackson’s motion and dismissed the petition.

Ellis L. Jennings, pro se. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Stuart A. Cole, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

{¶ 3} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. “[A] violation of R.C. 2901.13 does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction and is thus not cognizable in habeas corpus.” Daniel v. State, 98 Ohio St.3d 467, 2003-Ohio-1916, 786 N.E.2d 891, ¶ 7. “Claims such as statute-of-limitations violations ‘must be raised on appeal rather than by extraordinary writ.’ ” Id. at ¶ 8, quoting State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. Suster (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 70, 76, 701 N.E.2d 1002.1

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Foley
2022 Ohio 2260 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
Steele v. Shobert
2014 Ohio 219 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Adams
2011 Ohio 5361 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
Ogletree v. Bradshaw, Unpublished Decision (12-21-2004)
2004 Ohio 7100 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 Ohio St. 3d 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-jackson-ohio-2004.