Jennings v. Horton

59 Ill. App. 519, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 196
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 27, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 59 Ill. App. 519 (Jennings v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennings v. Horton, 59 Ill. App. 519, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 196 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a petition for a mandamus, not in aid of any case here pending, but, it may be assumed, in anticipation of some case that may come here, and the brief in support of the petition says: “We unhesitatingly declare that the doctrine announced in * * * Hawes v. People, 124 Ill. 560, is not good law and should not be a guide to this court, in such cases.”

As to the first clause or branch of that proposition we are not called upon to express any opinion, as we hold the opposite of the second clause or branch. Fitzpatrick v. C. & W. I. R. R., 31 Ill. App. 649.

The petition is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawes v. People ex rel. Pulver
17 N.E. 13 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1888)
Fitzpatrick v. Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad
31 Ill. App. 649 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Ill. App. 519, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-horton-illappct-1895.