Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons. Read the opinion of the Court — 657 F. Supp. 2d 65
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided July 29, 2011·No. Civil Action No. 2011-0411·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) TROY JENNINGS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-411 (BAH) ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Defendants have moved to dismiss this case under Rule 12(b), (2), and (6) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or for summary judgment under Rule 56. See Defs.’ Mot. to

Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summ. J., ECF No. 24. The Court ordered the Plaintiff to file

his opposition or other response to that motion on or before July 8, 2011, warning that failure to

respond to the motion carried with it the risk that the motion could be granted as conceded and

this case dismissed. Order, ECF No. 25; see D.D.C. LCvR 7(b). To date, the Plaintiff has not

filed any response. The Court will therefore grant the Defendants’ motion to dismiss as

conceded and dismiss this case, but will deny the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as

moot, and will also terminate all other pending motions. A separate Order consistent with this

Memorandum Opinion shall issue this date.

/s/Beryl A. Howell BERYL A. HOWELL DATE: July 29, 2011 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (D.D.C. 2011).

Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.