Jennings v. Division of Employment Security

238 S.W.3d 203, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1358, 2007 WL 2827796
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 2, 2007
DocketWD 67795
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 238 S.W.3d 203 (Jennings v. Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennings v. Division of Employment Security, 238 S.W.3d 203, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1358, 2007 WL 2827796 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

Lashawn Jennings appeals a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission disqualifying her from unemployment benefits because it found that she was terminated for misconduct related to her work. At the time of Jennings’s termination she was working as a temporary cashier and her job duties included making regular deposits from several offices operated by her employer. Fifteen deposits totaling over $20,000 were found by the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) in a bag in a filing cabinet. Jennings claimed she could not make the deposits because of a problem with the branch office’s records. She now contends that her actions did not constitute “misconduct” under the law.

*204 We affirm. As a published formal opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court and the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valle v. Green
238 S.W.3d 203 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 S.W.3d 203, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1358, 2007 WL 2827796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-division-of-employment-security-moctapp-2007.