Jennings v. Chelewsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jennings v. Chelewsky

96 A.D.2d 505, 464 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 505 (Jennings v. Chelewsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jennings v. Chelewsky, 96 A.D.2d 505, 464 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, etc., defendant Brooks appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Daronco, J.), entered September 29, 1982, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to her. Order affirmed, with one bill of costs. A review of the record indicates that plaintiffs did not have, and could not have had, an opportunity to litigate the prior determination in which Chelewsky was convicted after a plea of guilty of the unauthorized use of defendant Brooks’ car (see Gilberg v Barbieri, 53 NY2d 285, 292). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, etc., defendant Brooks appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Daronco, J.), entered September 29, 1982, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to her. Order affirmed, with one bill of costs. A review of the record indicates that plaintiffs did not have, and could not have had, an opportunity to litigate the prior determination in which Chelewsky was convicted after a plea of guilty of the unauthorized use of defendant Brooks’ car (see Gilberg v Barbieri, 53 NY2d 285, 292). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 505, 464 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-chelewsky-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack