Jennings v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

121 A.D.3d 502, 993 N.Y.S.2d 506
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 2014·No. 13220 306342/10·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered February 27, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants/ third-party plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment declaring, upon the first cause of action in the third-party complaint, that they are entitled to indemnification by third-party defendant Maryrose Mlayi for any sums they owe to plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Mlayi has not answered the third-party complaint, and indeed *503 there has been no showing that she was properly served with it. Hence, issue has not been joined, and the motion for summary judgment as against her must be denied (CPLR 3212 [a]; Republic Natl. Bank of N.Y. v Luis Winston, Inc., 107 AD2d 581, 582 [1st Dept 1985]).

Concur — Tom, J.P, Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jennings v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, 121 A.D.3d 502, 993 N.Y.S.2d 506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

121 A.D.3d 502 (Jennings v. Chase Home Finance, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Republic National Bank v. Luis Winston, Inc.
107 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)