Jennings, Jacob Andre

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 25, 2016
DocketWR-40,134-03
StatusPublished

This text of Jennings, Jacob Andre (Jennings, Jacob Andre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennings, Jacob Andre, (Tex. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-40,134-03

EX PARTE JACOB ANDRE JENNINGS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20127-A IN THE 329TH DISTRICT COURT FROM WHARTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to fraudulent use

of identifying information and was sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction.

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel rendered his guilty plea

involuntary. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.

1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 2

S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s fourth and fifth grounds in his

application. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

After reviewing counsel’s response, the trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions

of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial

but for counsel’s alleged deficient conduct. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). The trial

court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and

appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: May 25, 2016 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Hill v. Lockhart
474 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Ex Parte Patterson
993 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Taylor v. Higgins Oil & Fuel Co.
2 S.W.2d 288 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jennings, Jacob Andre, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-jacob-andre-texcrimapp-2016.