Jennings, Harvey v. Texas, the State Of

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 13, 1994
Docket05-90-01121-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jennings, Harvey v. Texas, the State Of (Jennings, Harvey v. Texas, the State Of) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennings, Harvey v. Texas, the State Of, (Tex. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Qlxmrt at Appeals JTtftlj Btstrtrt of ®exns at Dallas JUDGMENT

HARVEY JENNINGS, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F90- No. 05-90-01121-CR V. 03319-KH). Opinion delivered per curiam before THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Baker, Ovard, and Morris.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.

Judgment entered May 13, 1994. (SIxmrt of Appeals Wxftij Btstrtrt of Qkxas at lallas JUDGMENT

HARVEY JENNINGS, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F90- No. 05-90-01122-CR 03321-KH). Opinion delivered per curiam before THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Baker, Ovard, and Morris.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.

Judgment entered May 13, 1994.

Corner---'—•> S A. BAKER CE (Hourt of Appeals \. Wxfttf Ststrtrt of Qkxas at Dallas JUDGMENT / HARVEY JENNINGS, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F90- No. 05-90-01123-CR V. 03320-KH). Opinion delivered per curiam before THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Baker, Ovard, and Morris.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.

Cfifyfoytd- S A. BAKER ICE (£aixrt of Appeals Txftlf Btstrtrt of Okxas at Ballas JUDGMENT

HARVEY JENNINGS, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F90- No. 05-90-01124-CR V. 03322-KH). Opinion delivered per curiam before THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Baker, Ovard, and Morris.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.

Judgment entered May 13, 1994. Affirmed and Opinion Filed May 13, 1994

In The

(tfrmrt of Appeals JTtftlf Itsirtrt of Okxas at Dallas No. 05-90-01121-CR No. 05-90-01122-CR No. 05-90-01123-CR No. 05-90-01124-CR

HARVEY JENNINGS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F90-03319-KH, F90-03321-KH, F90-03320-KH, F90-03322-KH

OPINION PER CURIAM

Before Justices Baker, Ovard, and Morris

Harvey Jennings entered open pleas of guilty to four charges of aggravated robbery. Appellant pleaded true to an enhancement paragraphin each case. The trial court accepted appellant's pleas of guilty and true. The trial court assessed appellant's punishment at fifteen years' imprisonment in cause number 05-90-01121-CR, thirty years' imprisonment ........ W^^S&B^^v^iW'i'S'iiS

in cause numbers 05-90-01122-CR and 05-90-01123-CR, and forty-five years' imprisonment

in cause number 05-90-01124-CR. The court assessed a fine of $10,000 in each case.

Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeals are wholly

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the records showing why,

in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant.

We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se brief.

In March 1991, appellant informed this Court that he wanted to file a pro se brief.

We granted appellant extensions of time to June 24, 1991 to file his pro se brief. The trial court informed us that appellant received copies of the records. On March 30, 1994, we informed appellant he had thirty days to file his pro se brief or his appeals would be submitted without his pro se brief. As of the date of opinion, appellant has not filed his pro se brief. We decide the appeals without appellant's pro se brief.

We have reviewed the records and counsel's brief. We agree the appeals are

frivolous and without merit. We find nothing inthe records that might arguably support the

appeals.

We affirm the trial court's judgments.

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 90 901121F.U05

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jennings, Harvey v. Texas, the State Of, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-harvey-v-texas-the-state-of-texapp-1994.