Jennings, Beale & Co. v. Beale

23 A. 225, 146 Pa. 125, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1206
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Armstrong County·Decided January 4, 1892·No. Nos. 153, 273·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam :

The decree of the court below does not appear to have been satisfactory to either party, as both have appealed. We think the court was right in sustaining the master. The case was properly decided.

The decree is affirmed upon each appeal, and the appeals dismissed at the costs of the respective appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jennings, Beale & Co. v. Beale, 23 A. 225, 146 Pa. 125, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1206 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1892).

23 A. 225 (Jennings, Beale & Co. v. Beale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosenberg v. Nathan Benjamin, Inc.
49 Pa. D. & C.2d 188 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1969)
Resignation of Public Officials
33 Pa. D. & C. 441 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1938)