Jennifer Legarreta v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 29, 2014
Docket08-14-00163-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jennifer Legarreta v. State (Jennifer Legarreta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennifer Legarreta v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

JENNIFER LEGARRETA, § No. 08-14-00163-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § County Court at Law No. 2 § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of El Paso County, Texas § Appellee. (TC# 20130C13208) §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jennifer Legarreta attempts to appeal her conviction of possession of less than two

ounces of marihuana. Appellant entered a negotiated plea of guilty and the trial court assessed

her punishment at a fine of $300 in accordance with the plea bargain. Appellant subsequently

filed a motion for new trial alleging her guilty plea was involuntary. The trial court denied the

motion for new trial following a hearing. Finding Appellant does not have a right to appeal, we

dismiss the appeal.

Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal, including the trial court’s certification as

required by Rules 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d), but the certification reflects that the appeal “is a plea-

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may

appeal only those matters raised by written motion and ruled on before trial, or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2). The Clerk’s Office notified

Appellant that the certification reflects she has no right of appeal in this case and requested a

response. Both Appellant and the State have filed responses.

Appellant’s response asserts that she did not understand all of the consequences of

entering a guilty plea, and Appellant intends to challenge the voluntariness of her guilty plea and

the trial court’s denial of her motion for new trial. The voluntariness of a guilty plea may not be

raised on appeal from a plea-bargained conviction absent permission of the trial court. See

Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 81 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001); Lenox v. State, 56 S.W.3d 660, 664-65

(Tex.App.--Texarkana 2001, pet. ref’d). Likewise, an appellant must obtain the trial court’s

permission to appeal the denial of the defendant’s motion for new trial. See Estrada v. State, 149

S.W.3d 280, 285 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d). The record does not reflect,

and Appellant does not assert in her response, that the trial court has granted permission to

appeal any issues related to the voluntariness of the guilty plea or denial of the motion for new

trial. Based on the trial court’s certification and the record before us, we conclude that Appellant

does not have a right to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice August 29, 2014

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lenox v. State
56 S.W.3d 660 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Cooper v. State
45 S.W.3d 77 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Estrada v. State
149 S.W.3d 280 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jennifer Legarreta v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennifer-legarreta-v-state-texapp-2014.