Jennifer Lazaro v. Argyle Hilltop, LLC
This text of Jennifer Lazaro v. Argyle Hilltop, LLC (Jennifer Lazaro v. Argyle Hilltop, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00474-CV ___________________________
JENNIFER LAZARO, Appellant
V.
ARGYLE HILLTOP, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2022-03612-JP
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On April 20, 2023, and April 27, 2023, we notified appellant that her brief had
not been filed as required by the appellate rules. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We
stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten
days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion
reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See
Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: May 25, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jennifer Lazaro v. Argyle Hilltop, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennifer-lazaro-v-argyle-hilltop-llc-texapp-2023.