Jennifer Brooke Hodges v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 11, 2012
Docket07-11-00323-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jennifer Brooke Hodges v. State (Jennifer Brooke Hodges v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennifer Brooke Hodges v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-11-0323-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JANUARY 11, 2012 ______________________________

JENNIFER BROOKE HODGES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee _______________________________

FROM THE 320th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 62,342-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING _______________________________

ABATEMENT AND REMAND _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Jennifer Brooke Hodges, appellant, appeals her conviction for possession of a

controlled substance. Appellant timely perfected her appeal. The clerk’s record was

filed on October 24, 2011, and the reporter’s record on October 19, 2011. Appellant’s

brief was due on November 23, 2011. On December 12, 2011, appellant’s counsel filed

a motion to withdraw, which was granted on December 28, 2011. Also on December

28, 2011, appellant was notified by letter that the brief was overdue and that unless appellant’s brief was filed on or before January 9, 2012, the appeal would be abated.

To date, neither a brief nor an extension motion has been received by the court.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 320th District

Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall determine, by reasonable evidentiary procedure it selects, the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether appellant is indigent; and, if so,

3. whether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record and the appointment of an attorney due to his indigency.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters

(including the name, address, and phone number of any attorney it may appoint to

represent appellant in this appeal) in a supplemental record and cause that record to be

filed with this court by February 10, 2012. Should further time be needed to perform

these tasks, then same must be requested before February 10, 2012.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jennifer Brooke Hodges v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennifer-brooke-hodges-v-state-texapp-2012.