Jennifer Brooke Hodges v. State
This text of Jennifer Brooke Hodges v. State (Jennifer Brooke Hodges v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-11-0323-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
JANUARY 11, 2012 ______________________________
JENNIFER BROOKE HODGES,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _______________________________
FROM THE 320th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 62,342-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING _______________________________
ABATEMENT AND REMAND _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Jennifer Brooke Hodges, appellant, appeals her conviction for possession of a
controlled substance. Appellant timely perfected her appeal. The clerk’s record was
filed on October 24, 2011, and the reporter’s record on October 19, 2011. Appellant’s
brief was due on November 23, 2011. On December 12, 2011, appellant’s counsel filed
a motion to withdraw, which was granted on December 28, 2011. Also on December
28, 2011, appellant was notified by letter that the brief was overdue and that unless appellant’s brief was filed on or before January 9, 2012, the appeal would be abated.
To date, neither a brief nor an extension motion has been received by the court.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 320th District
Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court
shall determine, by reasonable evidentiary procedure it selects, the following:
1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether appellant is indigent; and, if so,
3. whether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record and the appointment of an attorney due to his indigency.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters
(including the name, address, and phone number of any attorney it may appoint to
represent appellant in this appeal) in a supplemental record and cause that record to be
filed with this court by February 10, 2012. Should further time be needed to perform
these tasks, then same must be requested before February 10, 2012.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jennifer Brooke Hodges v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennifer-brooke-hodges-v-state-texapp-2012.