Jennie L. Doyle v. Adon D. Haas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 31, 2023
DocketA23D0384
StatusPublished

This text of Jennie L. Doyle v. Adon D. Haas (Jennie L. Doyle v. Adon D. Haas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennie L. Doyle v. Adon D. Haas, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 31, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23D0384. JENNIE L. DOYLE v. ADON D. HAAS.

In this divorce proceeding, Adon Haas requested equitable caregiver status as to Jennie Doyle’s child under the Equitable Caregiver Statute, OCGA § 19-7-3.1. Doyle filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that OCGA § 19-7-3.1 was unconstitutional for various reasons. The trial court denied Doyle’s motion, concluding that the statute was constitutional. The court then held a hearing and issued a final judgment and divorce decree, which granted Haas equitable caregiver status. Doyle filed this application, specifically arguing that the trial court erred by finding that her constitutional challenge to the statute lacked merit.

The Supreme Court “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been called into question.” Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga. 657, 657 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996) (citing Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (1)). This exclusive jurisdiction extends “only to constitutional issues that were distinctly ruled upon by the trial court and that do not involve the application of unquestioned and unambiguous constitutional provisions or challenges to laws previously held to be constitutional against the same attack.” State v. Davis, 303 Ga. 684, 687 (1) (814 SE2d 701) (2018) (citation and punctuation omitted).

Here, the trial court expressly ruled on Doyle’s constitutional challenge to OCGA § 19-7-3.1 and jurisdiction of this application appears to lie in the Supreme Court. We therefore TRANSFER this appeal to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/31/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane
469 S.E.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
State v. Davis
814 S.E.2d 701 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
State v. Davis
303 Ga. 684 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jennie L. Doyle v. Adon D. Haas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennie-l-doyle-v-adon-d-haas-gactapp-2023.