Jennie Clarkson Home for Children v. Union Pacific Railroad
This text of 87 N.Y.S. 1137 (Jennie Clarkson Home for Children v. Union Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The questions presented in this case are the same as those determined in the case of Jennie Clarkson Home for Children v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company (decided herewith) 87 N. Y. Supp. 348. The judgment in this case, however, gave to the plaintiff a judgment against the defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company and Robert Gibson, as general partner of the limited partnership of H. Knickerbocker & Co. For the reasons stated in the case of Jennie Clarkson Home for Children v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, we have reached the conclusion [1138]*1138that the plaintiff is not entitled to judgment against the defendant Gibson,' and the judgment must therefore be reversed as to Gibson, and the complaint dismissed, with costs to Gibson against the plaintiff. The judgment against the Union Pacific Railroad Company is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against the Union Pacific Railroad Company.
VAN BRUNT, P. J., concurs in result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennie-clarkson-home-for-children-v-union-pacific-railroad-nyappdiv-1904.