Jennett v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Jennett v. State

110 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 678

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 1926·No. 4 Div. 225.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition law. In addition to the fine assessed by the jury, the court added four months’ hard labor for the county. Prom the judgment, pronounced and entered, this appeal was taken. The appeal is upon the record proper. The record is without error. Let the judgment of conviction stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition law. In addition to the fine assessed by the jury, the court added four months’ hard labor for the county. Prom the judgment, pronounced and entered, this appeal was taken. The appeal is upon the record proper. The record is without error. Let the judgment of conviction stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Jennett v. State, 110 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 678 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

110 So. 921 (Jennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.