Jenness v. Jenness
This text of 60 N.H. 211 (Jenness v. Jenness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
What conduct constitutes extreme cruelty as a cause of divorce is matter of law. Whether such conduct exists is matter of fact to be proved by competent evidence. Janvrin v. Janvrin, 58 N. H. 144. Isolated instances of neglect by a husband having the ability to provide his wife with the necessaries of life, or to furnish a physician in case of sickness, unaccompanied by circumstances showing danger or apprehension of danger to her life or health, are not, as matter of law, extreme cruelty. Whether' *212 the instances of neglect were such as to cause danger or a reasonable apprehension of danger to the life or health of the libellant, and prevent her from safely discharging her marital duties, was a question of fact. TBish. Mar. & Div., s. 769. There having been a frill hearing upon the facts before the referee, there was no error in the refusal of the court to recommit the cause for further hearing. Janvrin v. Janvrin, 58 N. H. 144, 146.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 N.H. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenness-v-jenness-nh-1880.