Jenness v. Jenness

60 N.H. 211
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1880·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Allen, J.

What conduct constitutes extreme cruelty as a cause of divorce is matter of law. Whether such conduct exists is matter of fact to be proved by competent evidence. Janvrin v. Janvrin, 58 N. H. 144. Isolated instances of neglect by a husband having the ability to provide his wife with the necessaries of life, or to furnish a physician in case of sickness, unaccompanied by circumstances showing danger or apprehension of danger to her life or health, are not, as matter of law, extreme cruelty. Whether' *212 the instances of neglect were such as to cause danger or a reasonable apprehension of danger to the life or health of the libellant, and prevent her from safely discharging her marital duties, was a question of fact. TBish. Mar. & Div., s. 769. There having been a frill hearing upon the facts before the referee, there was no error in the refusal of the court to recommit the cause for further hearing. Janvrin v. Janvrin, 58 N. H. 144, 146.

Exceptions overruled.

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenness v. Jenness, 60 N.H. 211 (N.H. 1880).

60 N.H. 211 (Jenness v. Jenness) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. Hart
39 A. 430 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1896)