Jenne v. Rix

Supreme Court of Florida

Jenne v. Rix

783 So. 2d 237, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 224, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 627, 2001 WL 326771

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 2001

DocketNo. SC95266

StatusPublished

This text of 783 So. 2d 237 (Jenne v. Rix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jenne v. Rix, 783 So. 2d 237, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 224, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 627, 2001 WL 326771 (Fla. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PARIENTE, J.

We have for review the decision in Rix v. Jenne, 728 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with Houser v. Manning, 719 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in State v. Paul, 783 So.2d 1042 (Fla.2001), we approve the Fourth District’s decision in this ease:

It is so ordered.

SHAW, ANSTEAD and LEWIS, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., and HARDING and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARIENTE, J.

We have for review the decision in Rix v. Jenne, 728 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with Houser v. Manning, 719 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in State v. Paul, 783 So.2d 1042 (Fla.2001), we approve the Fourth District’s decision in this ease:

It is so ordered.

SHAW, ANSTEAD and LEWIS, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., and HARDING and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

783 So. 2d 237, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 224, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 627, 2001 WL 326771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenne-v-rix-fla-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack