Jenne v. Rix

783 So. 2d 237, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 224, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 627, 2001 WL 326771
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 5, 2001·No. No. SC95266·Published

Opinion

PARIENTE, J.

We have for review the decision in Rix v. Jenne, 728 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with Houser v. Manning, 719 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in State v. Paul, 783 So.2d 1042 (Fla.2001), we approve the Fourth District’s decision in this ease:

It is so ordered.

SHAW, ANSTEAD and LEWIS, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., and HARDING and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenne v. Rix, 783 So. 2d 237, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 224, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 627, 2001 WL 326771 (Fla. 2001).

783 So. 2d 237 (Jenne v. Rix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rix v. Jenne
728 So. 2d 827 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
State v. Paul
783 So. 2d 1042 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Houser v. Manning
719 So. 2d 307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)