Jenks v. Veeder Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jenks v. Veeder Contracting Co.

264 A.D. 979, 37 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5606

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by18 cases

This text of 264 A.D. 979 (Jenks v. Veeder Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jenks v. Veeder Contracting Co., 264 A.D. 979, 37 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5606 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendants have appealed from a judgment of the Albany Trial Term of Supreme [980]*980Court in favor of plaintiff as administrator of the goods, chattels and credits of his deceased wife, in the sum of $16,107.40. The plaintiff and his wife, Amy V. Jenks, were joint owners of an automobile. On October 19, 1940, while the car was being driven by the husband, in which the wife was riding, at the intersection of Corning Hill Road and Route 9-W, a collision occurred between that car and a truck owned by the corporate defendant and driven by the individual defendant. As a result of that collision plaintiff’s wife was killed and plaintiff sustained personal injuries. Plaintiff instituted an action individually against the defendants for personal injuries, and also an action as administrator of the goods, chattels and credits of his deceased wife. These actions were tried together and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendants in the individual action of Jenks,. and a verdict in his favor as the administrator of his wife in the sum of $20,000. The trial judge reduced this verdict to $15,000. On this appeal appellants contend that the negligence of the husband is imputable to his deceased wife. No question seems to be raised about .the negligence of the defendants. The negligence of the husband is not attributable to his wife (Smith v. Clute, 277 N. Y. 407, and cases there cited). The administrator’s recovery for the death of his deceased wife is not dependent on his own negligence or freedom from contributory negligence (McKay v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Ry. Co., 208 N. Y. 359). The trial judge was not warranted in setting aside the verdict of $20,000, as found by the jury. Order setting aside verdict reversed on the law and facts and the verdict reinstated. The judgment appealed from is modified by increasing plaintiff’s recovery by the sum of $5,000, and as so modified, affirmed with costs to respondent.— Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Poster, JJ., concur. [177 Misc. 240.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendants have appealed from a judgment of the Albany Trial Term of Supreme [980]*980Court in favor of plaintiff as administrator of the goods, chattels and credits of his deceased wife, in the sum of $16,107.40. The plaintiff and his wife, Amy V. Jenks, were joint owners of an automobile. On October 19, 1940, while the car was being driven by the husband, in which the wife was riding, at the intersection of Corning Hill Road and Route 9-W, a collision occurred between that car and a truck owned by the corporate defendant and driven by the individual defendant. As a result of that collision plaintiff’s wife was killed and plaintiff sustained personal injuries. Plaintiff instituted an action individually against the defendants for personal injuries, and also an action as administrator of the goods, chattels and credits of his deceased wife. These actions were tried together and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendants in the individual action of Jenks,. and a verdict in his favor as the administrator of his wife in the sum of $20,000. The trial judge reduced this verdict to $15,000. On this appeal appellants contend that the negligence of the husband is imputable to his deceased wife. No question seems to be raised about .the negligence of the defendants. The negligence of the husband is not attributable to his wife (Smith v. Clute, 277 N. Y. 407, and cases there cited). The administrator’s recovery for the death of his deceased wife is not dependent on his own negligence or freedom from contributory negligence (McKay v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Ry. Co., 208 N. Y. 359). The trial judge was not warranted in setting aside the verdict of $20,000, as found by the jury. Order setting aside verdict reversed on the law and facts and the verdict reinstated. The judgment appealed from is modified by increasing plaintiff’s recovery by the sum of $5,000, and as so modified, affirmed with costs to respondent.— Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Poster, JJ., concur. [177 Misc. 240.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 979, 37 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenks-v-veeder-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack