Jenkinson v. J. M. Montgomery Roofing Co.
This text of 186 So. 2d 782 (Jenkinson v. J. M. Montgomery Roofing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 17, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and if is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied. The cross-petition is also denied.
The petition for attorney’s fee filed by Petitioner and Cross-Respondent Virgil Jenkinson is granted in the amount of $250.-00. The petition for attorney’s fee filed by Petitioner Virgil Jenkinson is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 So. 2d 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkinson-v-j-m-montgomery-roofing-co-fla-1966.