Jenkins v. United States

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois
DecidedMarch 8, 2021
Docket3:18-cv-00610
StatusUnknown

This text of Jenkins v. United States (Jenkins v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jenkins v. United States, (S.D. Ill. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTWON DESHANE JENKINS, ) Petitioner, vs. Case No. 18-cv-610-DWD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DUGAN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Antwon Deshane Jenkins’ Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (Doc. 113). On November 25, 2020, the Court denied Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition and declined to issue a certificate of appealability (Doc. 94). Judgement reflecting the same was entered on November 30, 2020 (Doc. 95). Petitioner filed his Notice of Appeal on December 8, 2020 (Doc. 96). Petitioner filed an affidavit stating that he is unable to prepay the docket fees of his appeal and has submitted a copy of his prison trust fund statement for the preceding 6 months, reflecting an account balance of $1,578.42 (Doc. 113, p. 9). A federal court may permit a party to proceed on appeal without full pre-payment of fees provided the party is indigent and the appeal is taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) & (3); FED. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A). An appeal is taken in “good faith” if it seeks review of an issue that is not clearly frivolous, meaning that “a reasonable person could

suppose that the appeal has some merit.” Walker v. O’Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 632 (7th Cir. 2000); Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000). Here, the Court questions Petitioner’s claim of indigency. In his affidavit, Petitioner states that he has no assets and no expenses; however, Petitioner has a prison trust fund account balance of $1,578.42. Moreover, a review of Petitioner’s trust fund statement shows semi-regular deposits from third parties. Therefore, the Court finds Petitioner is not indigent and can pay the docket fees for his appeal. As such, Petitioner's Motion will be denied, and the Court need not reach the question of whether Petitioner’s appeal is taken in good faith. Disposition Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis is DENIED. Petitioner is ADVISED that he has 30 days from service of this Order to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the Court of Appeals. FED. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Order to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 8, 2021 na SL. {Vv a DAVIDW.DUGAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minghao Lee v. William J. Clinton
209 F.3d 1025 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jenkins v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-united-states-ilsd-2021.