Jenkins v. Trump
This text of Jenkins v. Trump (Jenkins v. Trump) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
GARY V. JENKINS,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-324 (CJN)
DONALD TRUMP, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
In case number 24-cv-334, pro se plaintiff Gary Jenkins filed an incoherent complaint
against a multitude of defendants, ranging from a linen supply company to Donald Trump. The
Court dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Jenkins’ complaint was “patently
insubstantial.” Jenkins v. Williams, 24-cv-334, ECF No. 19 at 2. The complaint in this case is
essentially a carbon copy of that one. 1 It therefore meets the same end for the same reasons.
It is ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
The Clerk is directed to terminate this case.
This is a final appealable order.
DATE: August 1, 2024 CARL J. NICHOLS United States District Judge
1 Although he has only attempted to serve one defendant this time (Donald Trump), the complaint appears to intend to name all the same defendants as last time. See ECF No. 1. 1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jenkins v. Trump, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-trump-dcd-2024.