Jenkins v. Trump

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

GARY V. JENKINS, Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-324 (CJN)

DONALD TRUMP, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

In case number 24-cv-334, pro se plaintiff Gary Jenkins filed an incoherent complaint against a multitude of defendants, ranging from a linen supply company to Donald Trump. The Court dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Jenkins’ complaint was “patently insubstantial.” Jenkins v. Williams, 24-cv-334, ECF No. 19 at 2. The complaint in this case is essentially a carbon copy of that one. 1 It therefore meets the same end for the same reasons.

It is ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

The Clerk is directed to terminate this case.

This is a final appealable order.

DATE: August 1, 2024 CARL J. NICHOLS

United States District Judge

1 Although he has only attempted to serve one defendant this time (Donald Trump), the complaint appears to intend to name all the same defendants as last time. See ECF No. 1.