Jenkins v. Tillbrook

District of Columbia

Jenkins v. Tillbrook

270 F. Supp. 3d 1

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 29, 2017·No. Civil Action No. 17-1562 (UNA)·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Amy Berman Jackson,

United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiffs application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se submission titled “Tort Claim.” It appears that plaintiffs submission should have been filed in his prior case, Jenkins v. Tillbrook, No. 17-cv-1346 (UNA). The Court will dismiss this civil action without prejudice as duplicative.

An Order is issued separately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Amy Berman Jackson,

United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiffs application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se submission titled “Tort Claim.” It appears that plaintiffs submission should have been filed in his prior case, Jenkins v. Tillbrook, No. 17-cv-1346 (UNA). The Court will dismiss this civil action without prejudice as duplicative.

An Order is issued separately.

Jenkins v. Tillbrook, 270 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2017).

Pincite

270 F. Supp. 3d 1 (Jenkins v. Tillbrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.