Jenkins v. State
This text of 435 S.W.2d 505 (Jenkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The offense is robbery by assault; the punishment, 10 years.
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not challenged.
Appellant’s first ground of error relates to an alleged unresponsive answer given by a State’s witness during cross- *506 examination. Immediately after the alleged unresponsive answer was given, appellant’s counsel requested that the court instruct the jury to disregard the answer, which the court promptly did. No further action was requested by appellant, and no error is therefore before this Court. Hughes v. State, 433 S.W.2d 698 (delivered October 23, 1968), and Burks v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 925 (delivered October 30, 1968).
As his second ground of error, appellant contends that the prosecuting attorney committed error in questioning appellant about a prior conviction during cross-examination. No objection to such questioning was made, and therefore no error is presented. Ellis v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 379 S.W.2d 342.
Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 S.W.2d 505, 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-state-texcrimapp-1968.