Jenkins v. State

28 S.W.2d 1117
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jenkins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 Tex. Crim. 184
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 11, 1930·No. No. 13557·Published

Opinion

MARTIN, J.

Offense, robbery; penalty, eight years' in the penitentiary.

The only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence.

On October 12,1929, the store of Mike Spata was robbed in the city of Houston by some one at the point of a pistol, and $3 taken from the cash register. Appellant was fully identified as the man committing the offense. A tedious recital of the testimony would seem to serve no useful purpose.

Believing the evidence sufficient, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. State, 28 S.W.2d 1117 (Tex. 1930).

28 S.W.2d 1117 (Jenkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.