Jenkins v. State of Florida

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: August 13, 2025
• Docket: 1D2024-0258
• Status: Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2024-0258 _____________________________

KOBIE LASHUN JENKINS, SR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

August 13, 2025

ORDER STRIKING ANDERS BRIEF

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s appointed counsel’s Anders brief, which is insufficient under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g)(2), is stricken.

Appellant was charged with attempted second-degree murder with a firearm and convicted of attempted manslaughter. On appeal, Appellant’s appointed counsel filed an Anders brief under rule 9.140(g)(2). The brief provided a statement of the case and facts and then added an “Issues Presented” section, identifying three issues that “[t]his Court should review.” It then concludes by noting that counsel has “concluded that no good faith argument can be made in this appeal.”

Rule 9.140(g)(2)(A) places an obligation on the court to “independently review the record to discover any arguable issues apparent on the face of the record” if appointed counsel files a brief stating that an appeal would be frivolous. This statement must be “combined with a complete discussion of any possible points of merit to the appeal[.]” In re Ord. of First Dist. Ct. of Appeal Regarding Brief Filed in Forrester v. State, 556 So. 2d 1114, 1117 (Fla. 1990) (emphasis supplied). The Anders brief here does not state whether, much less explain why, any of the issues the record purportedly presents are frivolous. Rule 9.140(g)(2) obligates counsel to “explain[] why an appeal of the order . . . may be frivolous.” Blackmon v. State, 394 So. 3d 736, 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024), not to simply identify issues for this court to review.

Accordingly, appointed counsel’s Anders brief is stricken as non-compliant and counsel has thirty (30) days to file a brief that complies with the requirements of rule 9.140(g)(2) and In re Anders Briefs, 581 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1991).

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Victor D. Holder, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.