Jenkins v. State

91 S.E. 944, 19 Ga. App. 626, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 271
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 23, 1917
Docket8500
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 944 (Jenkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jenkins v. State, 91 S.E. 944, 19 Ga. App. 626, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 271 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

George, J.

1. None of the instructions of the court excepted to are erroneous for any reason assigned.

2. The grant of a new trial on newly discovered evidence is largely within the sound discretion of the trial judge. His discretion, unless abused, is not judicial error. The newly discovered evidence tends only to impeach one of the State’s witnesses, and the denial of the motion upon this ground was not error.

3. The evidence for the State amply sustains the verdict, and the verdict has been approved by the trial judge, and no reason appears why this court should interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O, J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. State
190 S.E. 663 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
McDonald v. State
94 S.E. 262 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 944, 19 Ga. App. 626, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-state-gactapp-1917.