Jenkins v. State

91 S.E. 944, 19 Ga. App. 626, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 271
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 23, 1917·No. 8500·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

George, J.

1. None of the instructions of the court excepted to are erroneous for any reason assigned.

2. The grant of a new trial on newly discovered evidence is largely within the sound discretion of the trial judge. His discretion, unless abused, is not judicial error. The newly discovered evidence tends only to impeach one of the State’s witnesses, and the denial of the motion upon this ground was not error.

3. The evidence for the State amply sustains the verdict, and the verdict has been approved by the trial judge, and no reason appears why this court should interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O, J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. State, 91 S.E. 944, 19 Ga. App. 626, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 271 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

91 S.E. 944 (Jenkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
190 S.E. 663 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
McDonald v. State
94 S.E. 262 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)