Jenkins v. State
This text of 91 S.E. 944 (Jenkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. None of the instructions of the court excepted to are erroneous for any reason assigned.
2. The grant of a new trial on newly discovered evidence is largely within the sound discretion of the trial judge. His discretion, unless abused, is not judicial error. The newly discovered evidence tends only to impeach one of the State’s witnesses, and the denial of the motion upon this ground was not error.
3. The evidence for the State amply sustains the verdict, and the verdict has been approved by the trial judge, and no reason appears why this court should interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 944, 19 Ga. App. 626, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-state-gactapp-1917.