Jenkins v. State

619 So. 2d 32, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6222, 1993 WL 191983
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jenkins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 563 So. 2d 791
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 1993·No. No. 92-1781·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the trial court erred by imposing an attorney fee against appellant without giving appellant and his counsel an opportunity to be heard as to the amount of such fee. See § 27.56, Fla.Stat. (1991). We reverse and remand with instructions to reconsider the imposition of such fee after proper notice to appellant and his counsel.

In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings.

DELL and POLEN, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. State, 619 So. 2d 32, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6222, 1993 WL 191983 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

619 So. 2d 32 (Jenkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.