Jenkins v. State

386 So. 2d 1302, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16974
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jenkins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 422 So. 2d 1007
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 1980·No. No. 79-542·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant claims that the trial court erred in failing to sentence him in accord with the provisions of Section 39.111(6), Florida Statutes (1979). We agree. The state proceeded against appellant, a juvenile, by direct information filed pursuant to the provisions of Section 39.04(2)(e)4, Florida Statutes (1979). In such case the trial court is obligated, when imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile as was done here, to make findings of fact and evaluate the juvenile based on the criteria set out in Section 39.111(6). State v. Cain, 381 So.2d 1361 (Fla.1980); Stallins v. State, 385 So.2d 1171 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). But see Postell v. State, 383 So.2d 1159 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).

Accordingly, the sentence of the appellant is hereby vacated and this cause is remanded for further proceedings in accord herewith.

LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ.,- concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. State, 386 So. 2d 1302, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16974 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

386 So. 2d 1302 (Jenkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Postell v. State
383 So. 2d 1159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Stallins v. State
385 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
State v. Cain
381 So. 2d 1361 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)