Jenkins v. State

781 So. 2d 1083, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 169, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 515, 2001 WL 252106
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 15, 2001·No. No. SC00-310·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of Jenkins v. State, 747 So.2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), on the basis of an alleged express and direct conflict with our decision in State v. Houck, 652 So.2d 359 (Fla.1995). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. State, 781 So. 2d 1083, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 169, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 515, 2001 WL 252106 (Fla. 2001).

781 So. 2d 1083 (Jenkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
821 So. 2d 1271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)