Jenkins v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Jenkins v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

155 F. App'x 641

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2005·No. No. 05-6736·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Deon D. Jenkins appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jenkins v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-04-1132HFF (D.S.C. May 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Deon D. Jenkins appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jenkins v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-04-1132HFF (D.S.C. May 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Jenkins v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 155 F. App'x 641 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

155 F. App'x 641 (Jenkins v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related