Jenkins v. Saul

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi
DecidedJanuary 4, 2021
Docket3:20-cv-00089
StatusUnknown

This text of Jenkins v. Saul (Jenkins v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jenkins v. Saul, (N.D. Miss. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION

KALINDA JENKINS PLAINTIFF

v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:20-cv-89-JMV

ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REVERSE AND REMAND

Before the Court is the Commissioner’s motion [23] for voluntary remand of this case. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the unfavorable decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for Title II Disability Insurance Benefits and Title XVI supplemental security income benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED for further action by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on remand the Administrative Law Judge’s new decision shall contain a finding of fact addressing the plaintiff’s ability to maintain employment pursuant to Singletary v. Bowen, 798 F.2d 818, 822 (5th Cir. 1986). Consultative psychologist Pamela Buck, Ph.D., examined the plaintiff on April 4, 2018 and noted that plaintiff “has had multiple work failures and difficulty getting along with others,” and opined that “she is not likely to consistently maintain employment,” raising a factual question that was not addressed in the earlier hearing decision (Tr. 616). The Administrative Law Judge’s new decision will further assess the persuasive value of Dr. Buck’s medical source opinion regarding the claimant’s ability to maintain employment over time, as well as the supportability and/or consistency with the record regarding all of the medical source opinions of record. SO ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2021.

/s/ Jane M. Virden UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PREPARED BY AND AGREED TO:

/s/ J. Luke Benedict J. Luke Benedict - MS BAR #102992 Assistant United States Attorney Northern District of Mississippi Ethridge Professional Building 900 Jefferson Avenue Oxford, MS 38655-3608 Telephone: (662) 234-3351 E-Mail: luke.benedict@usdoj.gov Attorney for Andrew Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

AGREED TO:

/s/ Leanna Reynolds (with permission) Leanna Reynolds – MS BAR #104947 Thomas U. Reynolds Law Firm P.O. Drawer 280 Charleston, MS 38921 Telephone: (662) 647-3203 E-Mail: reynoldsleanna@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jenkins v. Saul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-saul-msnd-2021.