Jenkins v. Murphy

Fourth Circuit

Jenkins v. Murphy

136 F. App'x 575

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2005·No. No. 04-8021·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Lee Jenkins appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jenkins v. Murphy, No. CA-04-1346-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 15, 2004; entered Nov. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Lee Jenkins appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jenkins v. Murphy, No. CA-04-1346-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 15, 2004; entered Nov. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Jenkins v. Murphy, 136 F. App'x 575 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

136 F. App'x 575 (Jenkins v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related