Jenkins v. Maryland

383 U.S. 834, 86 S. Ct. 1237, 16 L. Ed. 2d 299, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1913
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 4, 1966·No. 605, Misc·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the consent of the Attorney General of Maryland, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The motion to remand is also granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Maryland is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its decisions in Schowgurow v. Maryland, 240 Md. 121, 213 A. 2d 475, and Smith v. Maryland, 240 Md. 464, 214 A, 2d 563. This disposition of the case is without prejudice to any other questions presented by the petition for a writ of certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. Maryland, 383 U.S. 834, 86 S. Ct. 1237, 16 L. Ed. 2d 299, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1913 (1966).

383 U.S. 834 (Jenkins v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. State
349 A.2d 300 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
Street v. State
338 A.2d 72 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
People v. Santos
43 A.D.2d 73 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
People v. Veda
73 Misc. 2d 857 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1973)