Jenkins v. Jenkins

11 S.E. 608, 85 Ga. 208
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 S.E. 608 (Jenkins v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jenkins v. Jenkins, 11 S.E. 608, 85 Ga. 208 (Ga. 1890).

Opinion

Simmons, Justice.

There was no error in granting the injunction in this case. The plaintiff in error has no right to complain of the injunction. All the matters which she sets out in her claim, and in her answer to this petition, have been fully adjudicated against her, and she has no right to deprive the defendant in error of the fruits of the decree in the original bill by setting up a claim and attempting to renew the litigation adjudicated in the original bill. The judge of the superior court, if in term, should call the claim case and dismiss it, and allow the execution to proceed, unless the decree ou the original bill is complied with by John R. Jenkins.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steinberg v. McKay
3 N.E.2d 23 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Swain v. Macon Fire Insurance
29 S.E. 147 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 S.E. 608, 85 Ga. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-jenkins-ga-1890.