Jenkins v. Jenkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jenkins v. Jenkins

591 So. 2d 1161, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 797, 1992 WL 15861

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jenkins v. Jenkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 556 So. 2d 441 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 1992·No. No. 91-159·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties challenge several aspects of an order which dissolved their marriage and made various awards. Among other contentions, the appellant asserts that the appellee should not have been granted the right to use fertilized eggs or embryos which were cryopreserved. Suggesting that the matter is moot, the appellee has advised this court that she no longer has any desire for such use. We therefore amend the challenged order so as to delete all provisions relating to the fertilized eggs or embryos. As amended, the order is affirmed.

SMITH, ZEHMER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The parties challenge several aspects of an order which dissolved their marriage and made various awards. Among other contentions, the appellant asserts that the appellee should not have been granted the right to use fertilized eggs or embryos which were cryopreserved. Suggesting that the matter is moot, the appellee has advised this court that she no longer has any desire for such use. We therefore amend the challenged order so as to delete all provisions relating to the fertilized eggs or embryos. As amended, the order is affirmed.

SMITH, ZEHMER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Jenkins v. Jenkins, 591 So. 2d 1161, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 797, 1992 WL 15861 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

591 So. 2d 1161 (Jenkins v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.