Jenkins v. James River Insurance Company

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: February 10, 2022
• Docket: 2:21-cv-01969
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 RUSSELL JENKINS, Case No. 2:21-cv-01969-JCM-NJK

8 Plaintiff(s), Order

9 v. [Docket Nos. 12, 13]

10 JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY,

11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to enforce settlement, as well as 13 Defendant’s motion to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion to enforce settlement. 14 Docket Nos. 12, 13. For the reasons discussed more fully below, both motions are DENIED 15 without prejudice. 16 Defendant contends that a settlement agreement was executed prior to initiation of this 17 lawsuit which precludes Plaintiff’s claims. See Docket No. 12 at 3 (identifying release executed 18 on June 10, 2021, and Plaintiff’s initiation of this lawsuit on July 21, 2021). Defendant has not 19 explained why such argument is properly presented through a motion to enforce settlement, which 20 is generally a vehicle to enforce the terms of a settlement reached during the course of litigation. 21 Cf. In re City Equities Anaheim, Ltd., 22 F.3d 954, 957 (9th Cir. 1994) (“the trial court has power 22 to summarily enforce on motion a settlement agreement entered into by the litigants while the 23 litigation is pending before it” (emphasis added)). Arguments that a claim is precluded by a 24 settlement agreement that predates the litigation is generally raised through a motion to dismiss 25 (Rule 12(b)(6)), motion for judgment on the pleadings (Rule 12(c)), or motion for summary 26 judgment (Rule 56(a)). See, e.g., Skilstaf, Inc. v. SVS Caremark Corp., 669 F.3d 1005, 1008 (9th 27 28 1} Cir. 2012) (affirming dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6)).! Such distinction may be significant for a 2|| variety of reasons, including that different motions are subject to different standards. 3 Accordingly, the motion to enforce settlement is DENIED without prejudice. To the extent Defendant renews its request for relief in the form of a motion to enforce settlement, such motion must include meaningful explanation as to why that is the proper vehicle to seek relief. Because 6] the Court is denying the motion to enforce settlement without prejudice, the motion to stay 7| discovery is likewise DENIED without prejudice. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: February 10, 2022 10 a= _ Nancy J Kopp nited Sta agistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ' Although Defendant fashions the motion as seeking enforcement of a settlement agreement, the motion itself is asking that the complaint “be dismissed with prejudice.” Docket No. 12 at 6.