Jenkins v. Jacobsen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jenkins v. Jacobsen

237 So. 2d 280, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6155

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 19, 1970

DocketNo. 70-286

StatusPublished

This text of 237 So. 2d 280 (Jenkins v. Jacobsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jenkins v. Jacobsen, 237 So. 2d 280, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6155 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we are asked to review an interlocutory order denying the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint by adding as a party defendant the liability insurance carrier of the present defendant. On the authority of Ross v. Bowling, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 415 we grant the petition for certiorari and quash the order under review, remanding with directions to allow the amendment.

WALDEN, McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we are asked to review an interlocutory order denying the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint by adding as a party defendant the liability insurance carrier of the present defendant. On the authority of Ross v. Bowling, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 415 we grant the petition for certiorari and quash the order under review, remanding with directions to allow the amendment.

WALDEN, McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 So. 2d 280, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-jacobsen-fladistctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack