Jenkins v. Goodman

244 So. 3d 1198
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 25, 2018·No. Case No. 2D17–877·Published

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

*1199After a final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence was entered against him, Shermykael Juanius Jenkins filed a pro se "Motion for Rehearing or Appeal" which the trial court treated as Jenkins' notice of appeal. In his motion for rehearing or appeal and in this court, Jenkins alleged grounds that do not establish reversible error but may provide for relief from judgment under Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.540(b). Rather than relinquish jurisdiction for the trial court to consider those grounds, we affirm without prejudice to Jenkins filing a motion for relief from judgment under rule 12.540(b) within thirty days of mandate. See Armbruster v. Amber Int'l Corp., 416 So.2d 1220, 1221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) ; Glatstein v. City of Miami, 391 So.2d 297, 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

CASANUEVA and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. Goodman, 244 So. 3d 1198 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

244 So. 3d 1198 (Jenkins v. Goodman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glatstein v. City of Miami
391 So. 2d 297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Armbruster v. Amber International Corp.
416 So. 2d 1220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)