Jenkins v. Farris
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-21112 Conference Calendar __________________
GEORGE EARL JENKINS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CHRISTOPHER FARRIS; H. WALLACE,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-3946 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
George Jenkins has appealed the district court's dismissal
without prejudice of his civil rights action. His sole
contention on appeal, that the district court lacked the inherent
authority to dismiss his appeal for lack of prosecution, is
frivolous. See McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th
Cir. 1988). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED.
See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
We caution Jenkins that any additional frivolous appeals
filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid
sanctions, Jenkins is further cautioned to review all pending
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-21112 -2-
appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are
frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court.
APPEAL DISMISSED; WARNING ISSUED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jenkins v. Farris (Jenkins v. Farris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.