Jenkins v. Dalius
This text of Jenkins v. Dalius (Jenkins v. Dalius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6935
LUTHER JENKINS, IV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W. F. DALIUS, Warden; D. FONDREN, Captain; EDUARDO CAMACHO, Captain; LIEUTENANT DODSON, SIS; MR. GIGLIOTTI, Kitchen Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-271-5-H)
Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 22, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luther Jenkins, IV, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Luther Jenkins, IV, appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his Bivens* complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is
frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Jenkins v. Dalius, No. CA-03-
271-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed May 13, 2003 & entered May 14, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jenkins v. Dalius, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-dalius-ca4-2003.